Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 10:48
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What was your first experience like with a black man?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Nintendo Switch Summer Sale is live — 15 best game deals from $3 to snag now - Tom's Guide
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Vikings are worried about J.J. McCarthy (if you ignore everything they've said) - The Viking Age
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What do you like the most about black people?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.